TODD BOEHLY ANGRY WITH MARESCA! “Stop playing him immediately!” – The Chelsea chairman WARNED the coach for continuing to field a player who doesn’t even deserve to be on the bench According to him, this player is ruining the team’s efforts and almost caused the defeat against Liverpool A DIRECT MESSAGE THAT PUT FLICK IN A TOUGH SPOT!

Chelsea Football Club has once again found itself in the headlines, but this time it’s not for on-field brilliance. According to reports from internal sources, chairman Todd Boehly has issued a strong and unexpected warning to manager Enzo Maresca over the continued inclusion of a player whose performances have raised eyebrows among fans and pundits alike. The American owner, known for his no-nonsense approach and visible involvement in club decisions, reportedly told Maresca to “stop playing him immediately.”

The tension reportedly erupted after Chelsea’s tense clash with Liverpool, a match that nearly ended in disaster for the Blues. The player in question allegedly committed several costly errors that almost gifted Liverpool a late victory. Those moments, according to insiders, were the final straw for Boehly, who has grown increasingly frustrated with the player’s repeated lack of discipline and composure under pressure.

Boehly’s frustration reportedly reached its peak in the dressing room after the match, where he sent a direct message to Maresca. The message, described as both “angry and commanding,” made it clear that the chairman no longer wanted to see the player anywhere near the starting lineup. “Stop playing him immediately! He’s ruining the team’s efforts,” Boehly was quoted as saying. The warning, while direct, exposed deeper cracks within the club’s leadership and raised questions about how much control Maresca truly has over his own squad selections.

This public revelation has fueled debates about Chelsea’s internal structure and the extent of Boehly’s influence. Since taking over the club, the American billionaire has shown an unusual willingness to step into footballing matters, often blurring the lines between management and ownership. Some fans see this as a sign of passion and accountability, while others believe it undermines the authority of the head coach and creates unnecessary tension.

Maresca, who was brought in to stabilize Chelsea after years of managerial changes, now finds himself walking a delicate line. On one hand, he must maintain the trust and confidence of his players; on the other, he cannot afford to disobey the direct orders of his employer. Reports suggest that the Italian coach was visibly frustrated by the situation, as he believes in giving every player an equal chance to prove themselves through training performance, not boardroom politics.

Meanwhile, the identity of the player remains undisclosed, but speculation among Chelsea fans has been rampant. Many have pointed to recent poor performances in key positions, where individual mistakes have cost the team valuable points. Supporters have taken to social media to voice their opinions, with some agreeing with Boehly’s intervention and others calling it “unprofessional” for an owner to meddle so deeply in team affairs.

The online buzz surrounding the controversy has been intense. Hashtags such as #BoehlyVsMaresca and #ChelseaCrisis have dominated X (formerly Twitter), reflecting how divided the fanbase has become. Some believe Boehly’s actions demonstrate his determination to restore Chelsea to elite status, arguing that complacency should never be tolerated. Others, however, see this as a dangerous precedent that could discourage players and destabilize the locker room atmosphere.

For Maresca, the situation could become a defining moment in his early Chelsea tenure. His ability to manage the fallout—both internally and publicly—will determine whether he maintains authority over his players or becomes seen as merely an extension of the ownership’s will. A misstep here could easily cost him credibility in a dressing room already struggling for confidence and identity.

The timing of the confrontation couldn’t be worse. Chelsea’s form this season has been inconsistent, with flashes of brilliance overshadowed by defensive lapses and wasted chances in attack. Fans who once celebrated the club’s big-spending transfer windows are now questioning whether the lack of chemistry and constant changes in leadership are to blame for their struggles.

Inside the club, senior players are said to be watching the situation closely. Boehly’s decision to intervene sends a loud message: no one is untouchable. While this may push some players to perform better, it could also create fear and insecurity—two factors that rarely lead to success on the pitch. Maintaining unity, therefore, will be Maresca’s biggest challenge as the season progresses.

Ultimately, this latest drama underscores the fragile balance between passion and interference in modern football ownership. Todd Boehly’s intentions may stem from a genuine desire to see Chelsea succeed, but his methods have once again sparked questions about leadership and boundaries. Whether Maresca chooses to comply or push back will shape not only Chelsea’s next few matches but also the long-term stability of his managerial reign.

As the dust settles, one thing is certain—this isn’t the last time Boehly’s involvement will make headlines. Chelsea’s success now depends on how swiftly the club can turn this internal tension into renewed focus on the pitch, where results, not reactions, ultimately matter most.